Foxconn DigitaLife A79A-S

September 15, 2008 | 08:00

Tags: #790fx #am2 #benchmark #crossfire #ddr2 #mobo #motherboard #phenom #result #review #sb750

Companies: #amd #foxconn

Lavalys Everest Memory Performance

Website: Lavalys

Everest Memory Performance Test

  • Asus M3A32-MVP Deluxe
  • Asus CrossHair II
  • Gigabyte GA-MA790GP-DS4H
  • Foxconn A79A-S
    • 8072.0
    • 5038.0
    • 8541.0
    • 8043.0
    • 5029.0
    • 8094.0
    • 8024.0
    • 5027.0
    • 8448.0
    • 7947.0
    • 5019.0
    • 8397.0
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
MB/s (higher is better)
  • Read (MB/s)
  • Write (MB/s)
  • Copy (MB/s)

Everest Memory Latency Test

  • Asus CrossHair II
  • Asus M3A32-MVP Deluxe
  • Foxconn A79A-S
  • Gigabyte GA-MA790GP-DS4H
  • 51.2
  • 54.6
  • 55.4
  • 57.5
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Nanoseconds (lower is better)

Even though we set the memory speed identical to the other boards tested at 1,066MHz, 5-5-5-15-2tRFC-2T, the Foxconn is slightly slower in read and copy speeds and has a fractionally lower latency than the Asus 790FX with SB600 and Asus CrossHair II with Nvidia's nForce 780a SLI MCP. Neither is a huge difference in synthetic bandwidth scores, but it's something that can often pass itself down into real-world scenarios.

SiSoftware Sandra Lite XII.2008.SP2c (14.24)

Website: Sisoftware

Sisoft Sandra Unbuffered Memory Test

  • Asus M3A32-MVP Deluxe
  • Asus CrossHair II
  • Gigabyte GA-MA790GP-DS4H
  • Foxconn A79A-S
  • 8870.2
  • 8789.8
  • 8634.5
  • 8631.5
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
MB/s (higher is better)

Sisoft Sandra Random Memory Latency Test

  • Asus M3A32-MVP Deluxe
  • Foxconn A79A-S
  • Asus CrossHair II
  • Gigabyte GA-MA790GP-DS4H
  • 83
  • 85
  • 93
  • 100
0
25
50
75
100
Nanoseconds (lower is better)

Sisoft Sandra is somewhat less forgiving and puts the Foxconn A79A-S at the bottom of the table, 200MB/s slower than the Asus 790FX with SB600. Its latency, on the other hand, is only slightly higher than that of the Asus, but above both the other boards with integrated graphics chipsets.
Discuss this in the forums

Posted by Sebbo - Mon Sep 15 2008 07:42

nice to see one of the 790fx+sb750 boards reviewed, but how about the other one (the Asus m3a79-t)? would be especially interesting to see how it performs compared to its predecessor

Posted by mrb_no1 - Mon Sep 15 2008 09:18

i agree with sebbo, plus in my eyes asus is vastly superior to the likes of foxconn in board making as that is my preference, so maybe the chipset can perform when engineered by asus. We all know you can never get enough of mobo's and psu's anyway Rich :p

peace

fatman

Posted by Kúsař - Mon Sep 15 2008 10:32

Average MB for premium price...I'm rather interested in M3A79-T.
null
YouTube logo
MSI MPG Velox 100R Chassis Review

October 14 2021 | 15:04

In line with recent changes to data protection legislation in the UK and Europe we would like to direct you to our updated Privacy Policy here.